0:00
/
01:26
5.8 Quarantine 2: Terminal
Horror, Mystery & Suspense, Science Fiction & Fantasy
Earlier tonight, a bizarre disease was unleashed in a run-down Los Angeles tenement... and no one got out alive. Yet something escaped. Now, aboard Flight 318, the first symptoms begin to show. As the infection begins to takes root, innocent passengers suddenly transform into terrifying, bloodthirsty killers. Forced to land at an isolated terminal, and surrounded by armed government agents, the crew and passengers grow increasingly desperate. The only question now is how far they will go to survive.
Rating
R (for bloody horror violence, terror, language and brief sexual content)
Director
John Pogue
Studio
Sony Pictures Home Entertainment
Writer
John Erick Dowdle, John Pogue
  • Pretty standard infection flick. Better than the first, but the usual plot contrivances to keep the story moving along, with the inevitable 'escape' at the end to cover a sequel if it makes enough money...
    Reply
  • Very overrated, Not scary at all, Dull and boring at times, It's just like the first except in an airport, Nobody could act well, The story did follow on from the first but Quarantine was a English remake of [REC] but after [REC] 2 it changed the whole story around so it kind of adopts it own plot which wasn't too bad, I didn't like the ending one bit as we have one 13 year old Justin Bieber looking mother fucker who can't do nothing for himself but somehow survives, It's not very realistic when the most vulnerable person in the film survives, Kids should always die as they just ruin the illusion of the film, Full of plot holes and things that just were not needed i would only recommend watching if you're a fan of straight to Dvd horrors.
    Reply
  • Good horror movie. Mostly jump scares. Not the best but not bad at all.
    Reply
  • Very good very scary
    Reply
  • A surprisingly VERY GOOD sequel to "Quarantine." I was amazed. I went into it skeptical, because if I've learned anything about being a horror movie fan, it's that the sequel is never better than the original. Sometimes it's much worse. Not here. While the connections to the original are not evident immediately, the theme of human devastation in the face of unparalleled disaster reigns even stronger here. Good performances from a largely unknown cast. Intelligent scripting and writing. And of course, some great scares. Far more effort than one gets in the normal run of the mill assembly line horror sequel. Highly recommended to fans of the 1st film
    Reply
  • - We open to two stewardesses dressing in the back of a cab. Good start.- Oh damn. That pilot don't look so hot. Actually, he's hot as hell...WITH FEVER!- Oh damn. He sneezed and then pressed all manner of controls.- Since when could a crate of hamsters be brought on board a plane?- OH SNAP A HAMSTER JUST BIT A GUY. IT'S ON NOW!- "Oh ma'am, you're going to need to put your cat back in the bag." What?- Goddamn dude, use a kleenex.- Update on HamsterBite: Not doing so good. Horked on the stewardess. - The word 'stewardess' is really, really hard to type out.- Everything just gets more gross with every passing second.- HamsterBite is down. I repeat, he is down. Also, his name is Ralph Bundt. He's 400 lbs and it took like 5 guys to take his frothing ass down.- No, wait...HamsterBite is back up, but now the plane is going down. He also sorta kinda bit the now-less-than-cute stewardess' nose off.- Best line so far: "This is not okay," as they discover they are locked inside a now-abandoned airport. Also, SWAT is outside.- If you're keeping score, the mute paraplegic is doing the best so far. Not a scratch on him.- So many people touching so many things...my goosebumps have the heebie-jeebies.- Aw man, the mute paraplegic, trying to warn folks of the rat about to drop on his head, got a rat dropped on his head. And promptly got bit.- This just in...the "hamsters" are actually lab rats.- Hamster/ratBite's back! No, wait...he's subdued again. That's his 3rd takedown.- Oh damn. That's unfortunate.- Also that.- We're down to 4 people: a bioterrorist, 13yo boy, Army nurse, and the stewardess (the one with intact nose).- Ewwwwwww.- And the 13yo lives to tell the tale. As well as the infected cat & hamster/rats.
    Reply
  • I don't get when they say cheesy acting, I saw them doing a really good job. The movie did scare me
    Reply
  • Stop comparing it with Rec. A film should stand on its own, and this movie did that quite well. It may be a bit generic in terms of plot lines, but it is in no way a bad plot or a bad film. I really enjoyed this more than any of the haunting, ghost, exorcism, or zombie movies that came out in recent years.
    Reply
  • better then the first one
    Reply
  • In my opinion,the movie is quite solid. Although not as good and trilling as the first movie,it does gives a fresher perspective by dropping the found footage element.It does has it fair of scares,but overall it is nothing new on the plate. Not as trilling as the first Quarantine because it is somewhat predictable at times. Halfway through the movie it isnt scary anymore,and I'm serious.I really hate the side-cast(the other passengers of the plane) for being very annoying with their excessive nagging and yelling. Repetitive scares and the same wild chases. Overall,its a decent sequel of Quarantine that managed to answer our questions about the 1st movie. It could have been better with more effort.
    Reply
  • This is the reason why I hate airplanes, not just because of the shitty food but mostly my fear of it crashing or anything bad that could happen. But zombies!.Quarantine 2 to my surprise is better then the first one as I had more fun in a guilty pleasure way. The movie isn't good but it's laughable and also enjoyable in a way that makes it better then the first when it comes to enjoyment, because the first movie wasn't that good at all; just watch Rec it's much better.
    Reply
  • Every bit as good as the first movie with new characters, new location, and a nice bridge to this movie!
    Reply
  • I'm shell shocked that this sequel is actually legitimate!
    Reply
  • The first movie was a pretty good horror film and the second one follows the same story only at airport. Sequels are hard to make better but this one does a good job. Worth watching.
    Reply
  • Very slow stationif movie, the last half hour had the most action. Cool, how they tied in the first one with this one. The acting was B list, but not too horrible. If your into horror/zombie flicks, then this is right up your alleyway.
    Reply